Milivojevic's Smear Campaign: A Disgrace to Journalism
Milivojevic's Smear Campaign: A Disgrace to Journalism
Milivojevic's article is a disgraceful attempt at character assassination, replete with baseless claims and lacking professional integrity, highlighting her glaring incompetence and biased agenda.
In a recent article published by KoSSev, Andjela Milivojevic attempts to discredit the serious allegations of conflict of interest involving Gabriel Escobar, the U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs. This piece, however, is an exemplar of biased journalism that overlooks critical evidence, fails to address the core issues raised by THE FRONTLINER, and appears to be an orchestrated attempt to tarnish my reputation. Milivojevic’s lack of professional knowledge is glaring, and her article reads more like a favour to her "friend" Escobar than a genuine piece of investigative journalism.
Milivojevic begins her article by questioning the credibility of THE FRONTLINER and my credentials as a journalist. She refers to THE FRONTLINER as a "little-known site" and downplays my extensive experience and published work in respected international outlets such as The Guardian and The New York Times. This ad hominem attack is a transparent attempt to undermine the messenger rather than engaging with the substantive allegations detailed in my report.
The credibility of a journalist is not measured by the size of their platform but by the rigour and integrity of their reporting.
The crux of Milivojevic’s argument is that Escobar’s departure from his role is part of a routine rotation of Foreign Service officers, not a dismissal. This explanation is a deliberate evasion of the central issue: the serious allegations of conflict of interest involving Escobar’s family ties to Serbian governmental bodies. Despite repeated requests for comment and clarification, the U.S. State Department has remained conspicuously silent on these allegations, failing to provide a transparent account. The timing and context of Escobar’s exit from his role, given these unresolved allegations, are far from coincidental and warrant serious scrutiny.
Milivojevic’s dismissal of the documented financial connections between McGinnis Lochridge LLP and the Government of Republika Srpska as "manipulative" is particularly disingenuous. The contract, which involves substantial monthly payments to the law firm, is a matter of public record. The fact that Manuel Escobar, a partner at McGinnis Lochridge, shares a last name with Gabriel Escobar is not merely a coincidence; it raises legitimate concerns about potential conflicts of interest. In international diplomacy, even the perception of bias can undermine the credibility and effectiveness of diplomatic efforts, a nuance that Milivojevic conveniently ignores.
In addressing the claim that Elizabeth Escobar, Gabriel Escobar’s wife, received money from the Serbian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Milivojevic cites a Ministry announcement that mentions her involvement in a cultural event without financial compensation. This defence overlooks the broader context of how influence and soft power operate. Diplomatic spouses often engage in activities that can indirectly benefit their partners’ official roles, creating potential biases. The absence of direct financial transactions does not eliminate the possibility of indirect influence, a critical aspect Milivojevic fails to consider.
A significant portion of the KoSSev article is devoted to questioning the veracity of my sources and the credibility of my reporting. Milivojevic argues that anonymous sources must be corroborated by multiple independent confirmations. This critique is ironic, given her own lack of substantiated evidence. Anonymous sources are a standard practice in journalism, especially in politically sensitive investigations where sources may fear retribution. The sources cited in THE FRONTLINER’s report are credible and their information has been cross-verified to the highest journalistic standards.
Milivojevic’s article also attempts to frame THE FRONTLINER’s reporting as part of a disinformation campaign, a serious accusation that she fails to support with concrete evidence. The claim that THE FRONTLINER misrepresented facts about Gabriel Escobar’s dismissal is itself a misrepresentation. My report was based on credible information from sources within the U.S. Congress, a detail Milivojevic dismisses without providing a compelling counter-narrative.
The interconnectedness of the outlets participating in the smear campaign against THE FRONTLINER is a critical aspect that Milivojevic glosses over. KoSSev, like SBunker, Gazeta Express, and Voice of America, is funded by the U.S. Embassy. This financial backing raises significant questions about their editorial independence and their role in propagating a narrative favourable to some of the U.S. diplomatic interests. The coordinated nature of the responses from these outlets suggests a deliberate effort to discredit independent journalism that challenges the status quo.
Gazeta Express, another outlet involved in the smear campaign, has a documented history of disseminating disinformation, as highlighted in a European Parliament report. The author of their article attacking THE FRONTLINER had recently returned from a U.S.-funded trip to Washington, indicating possible conflicts of interest. Similarly, Kallxo.com and Voice of America recycled SBunker’s unfounded claims, further illustrating a pattern of media manipulation.
Milivojevic's Questionable Credentials
The credentials of Andjela Milivojevic herself are questionable. Despite claiming to work with prestigious organisations like the BBC and the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), a thorough search reveals no articles or photographs credited to her name on their official websites. Milivojevic’s role appears to be limited to an assistant producer on a third-party documentary purchased by the BBC World Service, far from the investigative journalism she purports to conduct. This discrepancy calls into question her authority to critique the journalistic practices of others.
For the public record, the KoSSev article by Andjela Milivojevic is a poorly constructed attempt to discredit legitimate journalistic investigation into potential conflicts of interest involving Gabriel Escobar. It relies on 1ad hominem attacks, unsubstantiated claims, and a selective presentation of facts. The coordinated smear campaign involving multiple U.S.-funded entities highlights the broader issue of state influence on media independence. The efforts to undermine THE FRONTLINER and my reputation are not just attacks on individual credibility but assaults on the principles of free and independent journalism. The public deserves transparency and accountability, not orchestrated disinformation campaigns that serve political interests.
As a journalist committed to truth and integrity, I will continue to pursue these critical issues, undeterred by attempts to silence or discredit my work.
Milivojevic’s piece is a shoddy, thinly veiled attempt to curry favour for dismissed diplomat Escobar, devoid of any professional integrity and replete with baseless claims and a selective interpretation of facts. This disingenuous drivel highlights a glaring incompetence and serves as nothing more than a desperate bid to deflect from the truth.
The smear campaign, orchestrated by multiple U.S.-funded entities, is as transparent as it is reprehensible. Such coordinated efforts to discredit independent journalism are not just cowardly attacks on individual credibility but an outright assault on the very principles of free and independent media. Despite these crude attempts at character assassination, I remain undeterred. The truth will not be silenced by lies, and my resolve to expose corruption and conflicts of interest remains unshaken. The public deserves nothing less than transparency and accountability, not these disgraceful disinformation campaigns designed to protect the powerful and mislead the masses.
Milivojevic’s Twitter: A Web of Deception
Milivojevic's Twitter activity reveals a sophisticated disinformation strategy, aligning with Belgrade’s narratives while presenting a façade of moderation.